Deliberation
PROJECTS
Integrating Citizen Deliberation for Impact (i4i)
Do citizens’ assemblies really have an impact? If so, what kinds of impacts? And how are these impacts shaped by the ways that the assembly is integrated into the political system?
The i4i project will compare national and subnational climate assemblies from the recent wave of processes across Europe to investigate these questions. It is a collaborative project funded by the German, Polish and Belgian Science Foundations, and runs from May 2024 to April 2027. The team and our aims can be found on the i4i website, which will be updated with data and publications as the project progresses.
Global Citizens Assembly Network (GloCAN)
GloCAN is a collaboration of academics from across the world interested in understanding how more citizen deliberation can be fostered in global governance. You can find more information about our research and events on the GloCAN website.
Our first set of projects focused on the challenges of governing deliberative processes and includes a report (pdf) that I co-authored comparing the backstage governance of citizens assemblies in Europe, East Asia and Latin America.
Bürgerrat Demokratie
with Brigitte Geissel and Stefan Jung
The Democratic Innovations Research Unit was commissioned by Mehr Demokratie to carry out the independent evaluation of the Bürgerrat Demokratie (Citizens’ Assembly on Democracy). The Bürgerrat Demokratie was a deliberative body of 160 randomly-selected citizens from across Germany, given the task of discussing the future of citizen participation and direct democracy on the federal level, which took place in the second half of 2019.
Our final evaluation report was finished in December 2019. Since then we have been thinking about the lessons from the Bürgerrat Demokratie for public deliberation in Germany more generally. An English language article is currently under review, so hopefully coming soon… And a short chapter on how citizens assemblies can strengthen representative democracy (in German) was published in Hendrik Herring’s new book, Parlamentarische Demokratie Heute: Erwartungen, Herausforderungen, Ideen
Designing Democratic Innovations as Deliberative Systems
with John Boswell and Graham Smith
What does it mean to design democratic innovation from a systems perspective? The demand of the deliberative systems approach that we turn our gaze from the single forum to the broader system has largely been embraced by those interested in democratic innovation. Nevertheless, there has been no analysis of whether the deliberative systems approach is helpful for doing democratic innovation. Is it possible to design a range of differentiated but interconnected participatory and deliberative settings? Does this better connect democratic innovations to mass politics? And does it promote greater procedural legitimacy? In this project, we analysed a rare case of one such attempt to design a deliberative system in the real world: the ambitious NHS Citizen initiative. NHS Citizen was an attempt by NHS England to design a complex participation system to contribute to shaping NHS policy. Drawing on a range of materials, from observation of the design process to interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders, we ask what can be learnt from this unique case for designing participation systemically.
You can read more about what we found in this blog post or in our article in Political Studies.
Posts on Deliberation
- Spotlighting the Backstage Governance of Citizens AssembliesMost attention on citizens assemblies understandably focuses on what happens on stage. What do the participants discuss and how deliberative are their interactions? But what happens on stage is in large part shaped by what is happening behind the scenes – for example, who decides what the agenda for discussion is, and how? In a new report from the Global Citizens’ Assemblies Network (GloCAN), we examine these backstage governance practices in cases from across the world and ask what they tell us about how to organise a global assembly.
- Bürgerräte und NachhaltigkeitEnde des Jahres 2023 nahm ich an einem Rundtischgespräch im Forum Nachhaltigkeit an der Universität Würzburg über die Rolle der Bürgerräte in der gesellschaftlichen Transformation zur Nachhaltigkeit teil. Im Folgenden finden Sie eine Abschrift meines Eröffnungsvortrags.
- Are elections a means to avoid difficult collective decisions about how we want to be governed? Some rough thoughts inspired by Michael Sandel.I am scribbling down these thoughts following a lecture at Goethe University by Michael Sandel on Democracies’ Discontents. There were two important but disconnected points in the lecture, which inspired a chain of thoughts for me on the nature of elections as an avoidance mechanism.
- Comparative Democracy PodcastsTo celebrate the new English-language MA in Comparative Democracy at Goethe University Frankfurt, Hanna Pfeifer, Julian Garritzmann and I took over the Talk Social Science To Me Podcast and produced three episodes on key themes in the field. All episodes are now available on your favourite podcast provider or click on the links below.
- Can citizen deliberation address the climate crisis? Not if it is disconnected from politics and policymakingA large number of national climate assemblies have been set up across Europe to enable citizens to make climate policy recommendations. But do these bodies have any impact? Drawing on new research, John Boswell, Rikki Dean and Graham Smith argue that greater attention should be paid to how these assemblies can be integrated into the world of politics.